Bacteria.

This is coolbert:

NOBODY IN ANY SORT OF SHAPE, MANNER OR FORM HAS EVER MADE THIS CONNECTION BEFORE?

The Swine flu [often referred to as the Spanish flu] epidemic of 1918 a killer but diagnosis not correct!

A subject, the pandemic, studied in great detail [?], conclusion incorrect in all respects? Could it be so?

"Did a Military Experimental Vaccine in 1918 Kill 50-100 Million People Blamed as 'Spanish Flu'?"

By Kevin Barry and thanks to the tip from the Lew Rockwell Internet web site.

"The 'Spanish Flu' killed an estimated 50-100 million people [that figure far beyond the number of soldiers killed in combat during the war] during a pandemic 1918-19. What if the story we have been told about this pandemic isn’t true?"

. . . .

"Newly analyzed documents reveal that the 'Spanish Flu' may have been a military vaccine experiment gone awry."

THINK RATHER THE TRUE CULPRIT OF THE EPIDEMIC BEING:

"From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley."

That British military base of Etaple quite often cited as ground zero of the illness. Sickness as having "jumped" from swine at the local piggery to humans. So it is alleged. But this is not so?

Often too I have thought the spread of the malady somehow related to the continuous and pervasive wearing of gas masks. Breathing in and out through the mask in some manner contributing to an unhealthy condition?

Military prophylaxis gone "awry". What if? Trying to do good but did bad! Exceedingly so.

I would be remiss if I did not mention that the Lew Rockwell Internet web site is for the most part anti-vaccine and anti-inoculation.

coolbert.