This is coolbert:
Some extracts and commentary from the book: "HUBRIS THE TRAGEDY OF WAR IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY" by Alistair Horne.
1. The French defeat at Dien Bien Phu.
*
De Castries, commanding the French garrison at Dien Bien Phu [DBP] was
no stranger to battle. The man did have a distinguished World War Two
combat record.
* "It is not correct to speak only of
'French' defenders. Many in fact were foreign legionnaires of whom the
majority were Germans escaping from the debacle of the previous war at
home. In addition, there were substantial numbers of colonial Algerian tirailleurs, who fought with varying degrees of determination in what was for them an unpopular war."
That
predominant number of personnel defending DBP not Frenchmen as that
word Frenchmen normally, ordinarily and commonly understood. The DBP
garrison, those combat contingents consisting primarily of French
Foreign Legion soldiers, colonial troops and friendly Indo-Chinese. A
French conscript during that period could NOT HAVE BEEN COMPELLED to
serve in Indo-China.
* No mention of Na San. From one
year earlier also a deliberate siege, the French emerging victorious
from what was for them a strictly defensive battle, the Viet Minh
sustaining heavy casualties. Taken in a vacuum DBP makes little sense.
Taken within the context of Na San DBP makes perfect sense.
*
As noted by Mr. Horne: ("that whereas during the 167 day of siege at
Dien Bien Phu the total number of air sorties was 10,400, in 1966,
during the Second Vietnam War, the weekly American total alone often
exceeded 25,000.")
Air defense assets of the Viet Minh
at DBP also quite formidable. Even if more air sorties of all types
available, aircraft on missions having to fly higher and faster, their
ability to deliver with accuracy on target ordnance of supplies that
much more limited!
* "Instead of the 25,000 shells that
French intelligence had assessed were all Giap's transport could bring
up, 350,000 had fallen on the garrison."
NOT ONLY many
more shells but rounds fired of larger caliber too. That number of
artillery as employed by the Viet Minh at DBP to include Soviet mortars
of 120 mm or larger.
Regarding the topic of Dien Bien Phu see previous blog entries:
http://militaryanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/11/na-san.html
http://militaryanalysis.blogspot.com/2011/02/analysis.html
http://militaryanalysis.blogspot.com/2011/02/dien-bien-phu.html
coolbert.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment