Dux Bellorum.

This is coolbert:

"tunc Arthur pugnabat contra illos in illis diebus cum regibus Brittonum, sed ipse erat dux bellorum"

"Then Arthur fought against them in those days, with the Kings of Britain, and he was their military commander."

1. "Archaeologists carry out first dig at tomb linked to King Arthur".

A TOMB REPUTED TO BE 3,000 YEAR OLD! WAY TOO OLD TO BE THE FINAL RESTING PLACE OF ARTHUR. ARTHUR ONLY FROM THAT IMMEDIATE PERIOD AFTER THE  ROMANS ABANDONED THE BRITISH ISLES.

Arthur more correctly described as a dux bellorum. A war chief. A professional military man trained by the Romans. Such has been my understanding.

2. "King Arthur, a Mystery in History".

From historum.com and as posted by AlpinLuke March 2020.

"In difficult times, the Post-Roman Britons were facing foreign migrants [invaders] with mixed success. Among them, a leader of illustrious origins, organized the forces and the resistance. He was Ambrosius. The confrontation went on until they clashed at Badon where the Britons were victorious."

Ambrosius = Arthur. Or is it Arthur = Ambrosius. Rather think Ambrosius is the king and Arthur the war leader, combat commander in the field!

Indeed. Disturbing the tomb and  final resting place of Arthur can bring forth "dark forces" unanticipated? Merlin the magician and all that. Arthur more than likely not myth but a real person. Merlin too a practitioner of the ancient Druid faith.

Good hunting archaeologists but beware of where you tread. You maybe on sacred ground!

coolbert.