This is coolbert:
“it is impossible to hide the external impact of the anti-shipping missile – one will immediately know what hit the ship. Moreover, to hit and sink such a target as the Moskva one has to launch a salvo and not only two missiles, likely 3-4 at least. In this case, Russia would know who attacked Moskva. Does NATO know? I am positive this event has NATO written all over it, if it is not an internal sabotage which absolutely cannot be excluded at this stage. I am sure if Nebo [Russian radar] was operational it would have seen the salvo.” - - Andrei Martyanov. Retired naval officer, Soviet/Russian navy.
YET again more Moskva stuff. From the "Unz Review" the story by PEPE ESCOBAR • APRIL 23, 2022 •
"A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma" -- Churchill.
The sinking of the Moskva the contrarian version!
"contrarian: noun - - A person who habitually takes a view opposite to that held by the majority. A person who expresses a contradicting viewpoint, especially one who denounces the majority persuasion"
[devoted readers to the blog be keenly aware that the Unz Review is almost always contrarian]
"Neither NATO nor Russia is telling us what really happened with the Moskva, the legendary admiral ship [flagship?] of the Black Sea fleet."
"NATO because in theory, they know. Moscow, for its part, made it clear they are not saying anything until they can be sure what happened."
"One thing is certain. If the Russian Ministry of Defense finds out that NATO did it, they will let loose all the dogs from Hell on NATO, as in 'asymmetrical, lethal and fast'."
THE DOGS FROM HELL!
The Pepe Escobar article a very long read I must admit. But worthy of a perusal, whether of the most cursory of manner or otherwise!
The gist of which is: "SOMEONE SOMEWHERE DID SOMETHING SOMEHOW!"
NATO is to blame but in exactly what way just cannot be determined!
coolbert.
No comments:
Post a Comment